The Death Penalty should be Reintroduced as a Punishment for Certain Crimes.
The death penalty is a punishment that is very controversial and is a punishment that was previously used in the UK but was abolished completely. I believe that it should be brought back as it can be a powerful deterrent to a range of extreme and dangerous crimes.
In addition, the death penalty can give closure to the victims’ families who have severely suffered for many years. It is apparent that the death penalty provokes many strong anti opinions but these must be challenged. Amnesty International is an organisation which believes that executions should be abolished, no matter what the circumstances. They are working to remove the death penalty altogether, claiming that they will work relentlessly to abolish the punishment in all countries around the world. Amnesty have also expressed their opinion about the effects of the death penalty and how they believe this does not deter crime. However, facts and statistics show that this is clearly not the case. We can look at Japan and see that the only two crimes that are punishable by the death penalty are in fact murder and treason. An amazing and a real eye opening fact about Japan is that there is only 1 execution per 18,067,952 people of their population. This fact really does underline my point about the death penalty deterring crime.
It is clear to see the death penalty is definitely a deterrent to someone who is planning murder. Without this put in place, murderers may not be punished as they deserve. We can also see in news reports that when murders are committed, the majority of views always seem to believe that the amount of time the murderer was given in jail as a punishment was either not enough or that there should be an alternative punishment, the obvious one of course being the death penalty. There are many reasons why I agree with this particular opinion, the main one being the amount of money that will still be spent on those prisoners who’ve deliberately planned to take away the life of another human being. A truly shocking fact that I found was that when court costs, police and other steps are taken into account, £65,000 is spent on the prisoner. An even more eye-watering fact is that an average of £40,000 is spent yearly on the inmate. So on average, a 25 year sentence in jail in the UK will cost £1,000,000 to cover. And guess who pays for that? The taxpayer. These murderers have killed a person and are given a place to live and given food, all for free. To me that just doesn’t seem fair, and that’s a big reason why I think these monsters should be punished via the death penalty.
Currently 1 in nearly 100 American adult citizens are in prison. As of 2014, the United States of America has an estimated population of 318.9 million, so you can only just start to imagine how many prisoners are in the USA’s system. A 2011 study has been revealed by the U.S Bureau of Justice Statistics stating that 2,266,800 adults were incarcerated in US federal and state prisons. Having the death penalty put in place for all premeditated murder cases would definitely cut down the amount of prisoners and also save the costs of services for the taxpayers.
When a murderer takes a life, there is an inequality of justice when the convicted killer is incarcerated. Why, you may ask, is there an inequality of justice? Robert Macy, a district attorney of Oklahoma expressed his opinion on the death penalty and its purpose. “In 1991, a young mother was rendered helpless and made to watch as her baby was executed. The mother was then mutilated and killed. The killer should not lie in some prison with three meals a day, clean sheets, cable TV, family visits and endless appeals. For justice to prevail, some killers just need to die.” The amount of pain, grieving and depression that the victims’ families go through just to find out this is extraordinary, and this is why I believe that the death penalty gives not only retribution but also a sense of equality and balance in justice.
I understand that there are people who believe the death penalty is morally wrong as there have been cases of wrongful execution. An example of where the death penalty has had a miscarriage of justice is the case of George Stinney, where this 14 year old boy was wrongly convicted of murdering 2 girls, both under the age of 12. He was given the death penalty and was killed using the electric chair. Although this may seem like a disadvantage for the death penalty, I believe that these mistakes happen very rarely and there will always be mistakes in a system containing criminals. Moreover, for the greater good of society, even though mistakes have been made, this system is justified in order to protect citizens.
To conclude, I believe that if a person deliberately kills another person, they should be sentenced to death. This gives consolation to families who will have to find a way to live their lives without those who were so close to them, and they will never be able to see those lost loved ones ever again. Another reason is the fact that it frees up space and saves money in the prison systems around the world, and most importantly it cuts down on the amount of deliberate murders in the short term and long term future, and cutting down on the grief for those families.

Recent Comments